Talk:Leprechaun (film)

Create pages
The second film does not have an article. Whenever it is eventually created, please add it to the various lists from the Lists of films. --Nehrams2020 08:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

-Why was the "Chronological Order the Films Go By" section removed? It seemed to be quite helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.250.168.248 (talk) 22:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lep1front.jpg
Image:Lep1front.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

What is it?
"Although they are more than willing to meet his desires, one of the painters, while biting it to determine its authenticity, accidentally swallowed it, complicating matters and leading to a night of terror." What is the text referring to?

Gold coin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.104.50.163 (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Leprechaun 7 Announced at Comic-Con 2007
"Bousman's next project is the musical Repo! The Genetic Opera!. Shortly after he finishes that movie, he would like to jump directly into a Leprechaun film."
 * "Daren Lynn Bousman adamant about making the next in the Leprechaun series at Comic-Con 2007.

POSSIBLE PLOT SPOILER:
 * "I'm making this pitch to Lionsgate right now," He told us. "My Leprechaun film is going to take place in the Old West. We have hookers, six-shooters, and a bunch of gold miners. Gold is what they are mining. What could be more perfect for a Leprechaun film?"

--Mithos90 08:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * INTERVIEW: COMIC-CON 2007 EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Darren Lynn Bousman and Tobin Bell on Saw IV!
 * COMIC-CON 2007 EXCLUSIVE: Daren Lynn Bousman Wants to Make Leprechaun 7!

Jennifer Aniston
The article says that this film is Jennifer Aniston's debut. That's not true: she played Ava Schector roll in "Camp Cucamonga" (1990), as you can see in Camp Cucamonga IMDB entry


 * Look carefully, the one mentioned by you is marked as a TV production and even the trivia for Leprechaun in IMDB has this as her first movie --http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107387/trivia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.159.142.168 (talk) 10:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

83.191.72.52 17:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)ligimeno From Spanish Wikipedia


 * Even if you're right, and I have no reason to believe you aren't, using IMDB triva pages as a source is a REALLY bad idea. 19:33, 17 March 2012 (UTC)19:33, 17 March 2012 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.132.155 (talk)

= Integrate these pages? =

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Leprechaun_(Leprechaun_series) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leprechaun_(franchise) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.78.240.7 (talk) 22:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Issues
There are several issues with this article. For starters it doesn't cite any references for the information on the film's production which is also underdeveloped and should be expanded. Also there needs to be some reviews from critics added to the reception section since it is completely absent of them here are several links of some notable reviews on the film (I am rather caught up on working with expanding other articles now so I won't be able to do it myself)--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC): Washington Post Review Austin Chronicle review