Talk:Leslie Barns

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Leslie Barns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130622061926/http://www.toronto.ca/involved/projects/lrv/ to http://www.toronto.ca/involved/projects/lrv/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Illustrations for sites considered
Re: Change by User:Joeyconnick described as "better as references because they are being used as references, as opposed to being used in an illustrative way". The diagrams were were intended as illustrations rather than references. The text already had a reference. The illustrations were provided because what they show would be difficult to impossible to describe in words. By presenting the links as references, most readers would assume there are no illustrations because they look like just another reference. I was thinking of putting the links to the illustrations in External links, but that would detach them from their corresponding text and they would loose context. (I originally coded them such as Hillcrest Complex, but that apparantly violates some editorial standard.) May I restore the "External media" template? I saw it used in other articles for the same purpose. TheTrolleyPole (talk) 02:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * that apparently violates editorial standard. That would be WP:ELPOINTS, point 2. Fairly fundamental guidance. It does say can be used, however. I'm still not sure why these illustrations are so valuable (they are really poor quality) but I'll revert myself. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I find the illustrations to be interesting what-if's, especially the one for the Hillcrest Complex which might come to fruition in future (Hillcrest Complex). TheTrolleyPole (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2020 (UTC)