Talk:Leslie Baumann

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Leslie Baumann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150315054325/http://www.skincare-news.com/e-3121-Talking_Skin_Care_with_Dr_Leslie_Baumann.aspx to http://www.skincare-news.com/e-3121-Talking_Skin_Care_with_Dr_Leslie_Baumann.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518082204/http://www.thestyleandbeautydoctor.com/2010/11/dr-baumanns-skin-type-solutions-find-out-your-skin-type-for-free/ to http://www.thestyleandbeautydoctor.com/2010/11/dr-baumanns-skin-type-solutions-find-out-your-skin-type-for-free/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518091810/http://www.skincare-news.com/a-2210-Featured_Expert-_Dr_Leslie_Baumann.aspx to http://www.skincare-news.com/a-2210-Featured_Expert-_Dr_Leslie_Baumann.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Negative coverage
Negative coverage about her exists. Please do proper WP:BEFORE and add articles like before removing the tag. 84.146.2.66 (talk) 11:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The maintenance tag I reverted claims that the article may have been created by a paid editor in contravention of WP:PAID. This has nothing to do with whether negative content exists. The tag solely draws editor attention to contributions by paid editors. However, the tag was placed by a banned sock puppet, and no evidence was preferred of paid editing. It is merely an allegation by a banned user. It can go. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)