Talk:Let's-Read-and-Find-Out Science

Unsourced information
Hello,

I've come across this article discussing books that currently lacks a credible source to back its claims. I would like to encourage you to take the initiative to provide verifiable sources for the information presented in this article. To draw attention to the need for citations, I will add a 'citation needed' tag. However, if the article continues to receive edits without proper sourcing, it may become necessary to consider nominating it for deletion due to its lack of reliable references.

Please remember about WP:SELFPUBLISH because it states that anyone can create a personal web page, Self-publishing a book, or claim to be an expert. That is why self-published material such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs (as distinguished from newsblogs, above), content farms, Internet forum postings, and social media postings are largely not acceptable as sources.

Unless if self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications.

You can read more about this at WP:BLOGS or WP:SOCIALMEDIA. Thanks, TheAlienMan2002 (talk) 22:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)