Talk:Let L-410 Turbolet

Content from this article was merged into L-410. BigDT 16:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

File:Let L410UVP-E16 Góraszka 2008 edit2.JPG to appear as POTD soon
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Let L410UVP-E16 Góraszka 2008 edit2.JPG will be appearing as picture of the day on May 6, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-05-06. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks!  howcheng  {chat} 23:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Performance Section
Hi I was just wondering why the performance figures aren't taken directly from this website: http://www.let.cz/index.php?sec=12&selected=0&other_text=1&ndps=Performance&letadlo_id=6   as it is the official website? or is there something wrong with these figures?

RL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.111.83 (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I proposer this merge because the NG is no more than a variuant of the 410 and does not warrant a stand-alone article--Petebutt (talk) 05:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge: The new variant is not notable enough to stand on its own - or at least, not for some time yet. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 16:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Let L-410 Turbolet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080327030335/http://www.washington.edu:80/alumni/alumnitgdy/mem_mexindex.html to http://www.washington.edu/alumni/alumnitgdy/mem_mexindex.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140322013931/http://www.greenair.com.np/ to http://www.greenair.com.np/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Checked, but greenair.com doesn't seem to really add much to the article. Redalert2fan (talk) 15:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Let L-410 Turbolet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070327103840/http://www.washington.edu:80/alumni/alumnitgdy/mem_mexindex.html to http://www.washington.edu/alumni/alumnitgdy/mem_mexindex.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121005002527/http://www.eltiempo.com/nacion/llano/2007-10-11/ARTICULO-WEB-NOTA_INTERIOR-3761687.html to http://www.eltiempo.com/nacion/llano/2007-10-11/ARTICULO-WEB-NOTA_INTERIOR-3761687.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Checked. Redalert2fan (talk) 15:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

main pic
--Marc Lacoste (talk) 22:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, the second looks best, the first is air force plane (which is not original purpose of this plane) and the third has distracting colors and is also quite from below. Jirka.h23 (talk) 06:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Merge proposal

 * Oppose - BilCat (talk) 07:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Support. Similar airframe, minor update of engine rating and avionics: not a major variant but a minor one, does not not deserve a standalone article. I'm not sure the reader benefits from having a second page.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 10:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose A fairly substantial upgrade in all systems. Deserves a new article or merging L-410 into IT!!--Petebutt (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Fairly substantial? LCD cockpit like everything else, +6% hp and +6% MTOW: not a very big change. At this rate the 242t A330 should have a standalone article too. Anyway, I would be OK with merging Let 410 into L 410 NG.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 20:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Oppose. L 410 NG has significant changes. It has extended 'nose' for 2x more storage, new more powerful and quieter engines with different Avia-725 propellers, new wing design, new cockpit by Garmin, it has a double range and can hold 500 kg more cargo. Jirka.h23 (talk) 07:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Jirka. / EstrellaSuecia (talk) 05:32, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Max range wrong
Max range (FL140, + reserve 45 min.): 2 570 km 46.135.16.206 (talk) 07:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC)


 * You'll need to provide a reliable source. BilCat (talk) 07:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The currently presented range is the -UVP variant at max payload (1.8t) and is still correct. The 2 570 km figure is the NG ferry range (zero payload), not very informative of an aircraft real capabilities. Range with all seats occupied is more interesting. I proposed to show the payload-range diagram when available but this doesn't had support.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Two hours in a plane with no lav would be a practical limit either way!
 * The source quoted (which is by the manufacturer of the aircraft - so should have at least some credence) gives a maximum range of 1500 km (at FL140 and with 45 min reserves) - with a range with maximum payload shown on a graph of about 500 km (as the graph has no scale, I'm not sure so we can say 510 km confidently).Nigel Ish (talk) 07:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)