Talk:Letting Go (Body of Proof)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 16:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Otherwise, a good article. On hold for seven days.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   22:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC) - Thanks for the review, very thorough! :) — M.Mario  (T/C) 13:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Intro: "who seem to be hiding" -> "both of whom seem to be hiding" ✅
 * Intro: You don't need to link United States, per Overlink ✅ - one links to Television in the United States, one just links to the country.
 * Intro: Maybe organize the last paragraph a bit better so that the Nielsen ratings and the sentence about the lower ratings are next to each other. Not a biggie.❌ - Would have to change all BOP articles to fit this, and in a previous review, I got told "Critics, then ratings".
 * Plot: Why is there a reference for the first sentence? I'd just put all of them at the end of the entire section ✅
 * Plot: "Brian is repeating this with Nina" Maybe something like "Brian has started to abuse Nina, however." just to make it clearer ✅
 * Plot: You don't need to cite the episode with the episode. It's assumed that, since this is a page on the episode, the episode will automatically be used as a reference ❌ - In all BOP articles, just a back up on DYK reviews and FAC reviews.
 * Production: "best known for directing" -> "best known for directing episodes of" ✅
 * Production: Just a personal preference, but I think 'season 1' looks better as either "season one" or "the first season". Same with 'season 2' - ❌ In all BOP articles, and page name.
 * Reception: "Among viewers between ages 18 and 49, it received a 2.0 rating/9 share; a share represents the percentage of households using a television at the time the program is airing." -> "Among viewers between ages 18 and 49, it received a 2.0 rating/9 share. This means that it was seen by 2 percent of all 18- to 49-year-olds, and 9 percent of all 18- to 49-year-olds watching television at the time of the broadcast." ✅
 * Reception: Why does a statement from Christine Orlando of TV Fanatic end in a question mark? ✅
 * Reception: "She praised the interaction between the Megan" Kill 'the' ✅
 * Reception: "She finished, ""Letting Go" definitely" -> "She finished, "'Letting Go' definitely" (single quotes) ✅
 * References: add writer and director for Ref 2 and 6 - ❌ - Ref 2 is the article now - in the infobox, ref 6 is linked to the article. No need.
 * References: Use consistent dating methods (either Day Month, Year; Month Day, Year; etc) ✅
 * No, American should still be unlinked as per WP:OVERLINK guidelines. Even if its to Television in the United States. TBrandley 16:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * One is linked to "America and one is linked to Television in the United States. WP:OVERLINK does not work, if there are same words, linked to seperate articles. — M.Mario  (T/C) 16:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The link to America should be unlinked because per WP:OVERLINK you should Avoid linking the names of major geographic features and locations, languages, religions, and common professions.; this includes countries. Also, television in the US should be because it is a common term, and it does not enhance the reader's comprehensiveness. WP:OVERLINK does not just refer to the repeated linking of terms, but also the linking of general terms. TRLIJC19  ( talk  •  contribs ) 16:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * In the review by TBrandley here, it says "Link American to Television in the United States", so is this wrong? — M.Mario  (T/C) 16:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * TBrandley continues to learn, and was probably not aware of the overlinking when doing that review. TRLIJC19  ( talk  •  contribs ) 16:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I was not blaming him, but just wanted justification. — M.Mario  (T/C) 16:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * That's fine. At that time, I thought United States is overlink, and TV in US wasn't. TV in US is a common term. TBrandley 16:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

This all looks good now. I will pass it. Congrats!-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   02:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)