Talk:Leuschner Observatory/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Plarem (talk · contribs) 20:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion
Please ask questions if there is a need for that. – Plarem (User talk contribs) 20:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * One MoS issue, and then a pass! – Plarem (User talk contribs) 20:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Regarding the units of measurement, I had imperfectly followed the convention for measurements used as adjectives (MOS:HYPHEN). I think it is all now consistent in using hyphens. James McBride (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, I did not read that part of the WP:MOS.

PASS &mdash;–Well done on bringing Leuschner Observatory to be a Good Article! – Plarem (User talk contribs) 19:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC)