Talk:Levan of Kartli

Requested move 03 February 2014

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Levan of Kartli → Prince Levan of Kartli – He was a prince and regent so should be moved to "Prince". --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 23:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Jaqeli (talk) 17:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Support as nominator. Jaqeli (talk) 17:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The support of a nominator is implied and does not need to be stated additionally. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Most often true but not always. As long as it's done openly like this it does no harm, and sometimes it does help to make it explicit, so it should not be discouraged. I sometimes do if I feel that there is any doubt as to my position. Agree that it was not necessary in this case, but again I can't see any harm in it. Andrewa (talk) 10:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: It seems desirable to omit the WP:HONORIFIC unless, per WP:AT, "the person is far better recognised with the title than without". Is that the case here? —BarrelProof (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Per Wikipedia's naming conventions - Naming conventions (royalty and nobility) - a more appropriate name, in line with articles of other royals, might be Levan, Regent of Kartli. --Rushton2010 (talk) 22:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Svimon (1683–1740)
It is stated in this article that he is a legitimate son of Levan whereas in his own article he is said illegitimate. Please correct if possible. E.Polti (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Levan of Kartli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114191552/http://www.iranica.com/articles/v10f5/v10f504b.html to http://www.iranica.com/articles/v10f5/v10f504b.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:20, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Levan of Kartli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040905204640/http://rustaveli.tripod.com/sakartvelo/history/17century.html to http://rustaveli.tripod.com/sakartvelo/history/17century.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC)