Talk:Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden

Article tone
What happened to this article? This seems like someone copy and pasted from the website. I understand the enthusiasm, but it seems like an advertising - complete with a phone number in the text? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrenjpeterson (talk • contribs) 02:47, 26 May 2008
 * An overzealous employee or fan I suppose, I've added a cleanup tag. -- MiG (talk) 08:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I've acted on that cleanup tag, improving the tone to a more encyclopedic one. I looked to see if this text was copied from some copyright source but didn't find any.  It appears to be an editor who meant well but ended up including a lot of original research which was incorrectly tagged as coming from a single brief history page on the official website. The previous version, particularly the history section, read more like a promotional brochure for the property and biography of the family. The language has been made more neutral, more references used and cited, and appropriate links added to Ginter's existing biographic article.--MadeYourReadThis (talk) 16:54, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090124104306/http://richmondwiki.org/wiki/Lewis_Ginter_Botanical_Garden to http://www.richmondwiki.org/wiki/Lewis_Ginter_Botanical_Garden

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)