Talk:Lexicase

Initially, this article lacked sufficient citations, which have been added in several necessary places throughout the articleMalves98 (talk) 14:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC). Thus, that label has been removed. Malves98 (talk) 14:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Numerous relevant publications using Lexicase or referring to Lexicase (e.g., in an encyclopedia of Linguistics) have been added. This permits the removal of the warning about a lack of external references. Malves98 (talk) 15:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Regarding the warning note about a lack of notability, first, Lexicase is referenced in the Wikipedia article in a list of Dependency Grammar articles. All the other theories listed have their own Wikipedia pages. Thus, it is only logical to include one for Lexicase. Beyond that, Lexicase theory has been noted in an encyclopedia of linguistics, and while it does not have current active progress, it has historical significance. The lengthy only partial listed references also show the amount of activity. Moreover, the research publications using Lexicase have also been used in other publications, highlighting the lasting effect of the research coming out of Lexicase. Therefore, it is necessary to remove the warning about notability. Malves98 (talk) 15:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your contributions, Malves98. Your work has been noted and is appreciated. Lexicase definitely deserves this page. I am in favor of expanding the article and may add some more information myself. In fact, the other DG articles (on Word Grammar, Meaning-Text Theory, and Functional Generative Description) also warrant expanding. --Tjo3ya (talk) 22:53, 25 July 2016 (UTC)