Talk:Liam Öhgren

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Insufficient references to meet WP:V. Multiple reliable sources with significant coverage are required. I'm not convinced that the one source used in the article is independent, as it includes a lot of promotional language and reads like something paid for by the player's publicity team.

—  Insertcleverphrasehere(or here) (or here) (or here)  01:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Agree, however meets WP:NHOCKEY as a first round draft pick Bruxton (talk) 01:50, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh... I'm aware. But the SNGs are not in-fact a silver bullet that means something automatically passes notability. In fact they are only written as a guide for what is likely to meet the GNG. If we really can't find anything better than what is in the article, then we should not have an article. —  Insertcleverphrasehere(or here) (or here) (or here)  01:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)