Talk:Liber de arte distillandi de simplicibus

Possible Original Research
Is there a reference for the information about the title page? It appears to be original research drawn from conjecture about the similarity of the two title pages. I can't deny that they do look similar, but unless there is an authoritative source that you have which says that one illustration was drawn from the other then it would probably be best to remove the information. Best wishes, Fritzmann (message me) 19:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Fritzmann2002. Hallo Fritzmann2002. I agree with you. Best wishes --Michael Eyl (talk) 07:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Fritzmann2002. Thank you for the literature, you describe in your article. The works of Bess (1979) and Taape (2014) were not known to me. It will take me some time, to read them. Do you know the work of Heike Will (2009)? It is written in German, but you will get into it after a short while of work with translation-KI. Please contact me, if you have any questions.
 * Heike Will: Vergleich der Indikationen des 'Kleinen Destillierbuches’ des Chirurgen Hieronymus Brunschwig (Straßburg 1500) mit den nach derzeitigem wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisstand belegten Indikationen. Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Dissertation, Würzburg 2009 (PDF).
 * Best wishes --Michael Eyl (talk) 07:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * What is still missing in your article is a description of Brunschwig the botanist. We (latest since Hermann Fischer 1929) consider him to be a direct precursor of the so-called «German fathers of Botany» (Otto Brunfels, Hieronymus Bock and Leonhart Fuchs). Best wishes --Michael Eyl (talk) 11:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)