Talk:Licancabur/Archive 1

Volcan Juriques?
I've noticed that the peak located just east of Licancabur, named Volcan Juriques, does not exist on Wikipedia. I'm signing off for the moment, but when I get back (most likely sometime tomorrow if I'm not reading Dawkins' The Blind Watchmaker), I'll create it and hopefully edit it and this one to the point of meaningfulness. For the time being, I think an "improve" template is in order, as I'm going to need all the help I can get. That's all for now.

TydeNet 07:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Location
Corrected the location so everyone can know it is officially located in Chile and not Bolivia. Hope this helps. TydeNet 06:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The highest point of Licancabur forms part of the border between Bolivia and Chile. Apparently, the crater lake is located entirely within Chilean territory. See (plugin needed, SVG Viewer). This may be a reason for the confusion. Jespinos 20:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

"most volcanic activity"
A year date or age should be provided for this citation. 143.232.210.46 (talk) 22:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Licancabur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120415020829/http://www.extremeenvironment.com/2003/ to http://www.extremeenvironment.com/2003/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Citation question
User:Jo-Jo Eumerus, can you help me out? I am puzzled by the Rudolph 1955 citation--apparently that's "via" this article. What does that mean? Note also that the Rudolph article is cited in teh bibliography as if it's one single page, 151; that can't be right. And, of course, that's the same article as this one, cited under Le Paige, with the mysterious page numbers shifted by one. That source is also the one referencing that the volcano "stands out" and I was curious about that. Drmies (talk) 02:42, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Seems like when editing the page that I mixed up two JSTOR based sources - the Rudolph one which I can access through JSTOR and the Estudios Atacamenos one which I need to access another way. That second source for some reason has two different page numbering schemes depending on whether you look at it through JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org/stable/25674576?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents) or a direct way (http://www.estudios-atacamenos.ucn.cl/revista/pdf/numero06/EA6-3.pdf). The page numbers used in the citations refer to the PDF version. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:42, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks! That is a nice article (and yeah, that hook about how the volcano looks would have been inappropriate: the author is waxing a bit poetic). But what a fascinating area. I want to go. Drmies (talk) 13:22, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Licancabur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160813150343/http://www.estudios-atacamenos.ucn.cl/revista/pdf/numero06/EA6-3.pdf to http://www.estudios-atacamenos.ucn.cl/revista/pdf/numero06/EA6-3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Snow line above elevation of mountain?
The article states that the highest point is 5,916 m and the snow line is estimated at 6,190 metres. I can't access the full documentation of the snow line reference, but does it make sense that a snow line can be above the highest elevation? Linktex (talk) 15:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Going by memory, yes. Sometimes snowlines are established by measuring the snowline on a mountain - and such a snow line by definition cannot be taller than the mountain in question - but other times it gets interpolated from neighbouring mountains or from climatology, and such snowlines can be higher than the top of a mountain. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Theses?
Are these sources reliable?
 * http://repositorio.uchile.cl/tesis/uchile/2008/rivera_nr/sources/04.pdf
 * https://books.google.ch/books?hl=de&lr=&id=DAcebWSiqbYC&oi=fnd&pg=PT224&dq=%22licancabur%22&ots=dvLh-8gMNh&sig=kW9TUtZOAGG1kRJFmxxwdQVhNCA#v=onepage&q=%22licancabur%22&f=false
 * https://books.google.ch/books?hl=de&lr=&id=a4U0e8nuZiMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA17&dq=%22licancabur%22&ots=VVB3m3xlLn&sig=Yy5bBep3Yu4S63oSPdWXd-ubTA0#v=onepage&q=licancabur&f=false
 * http://www.theses.fr/2001PA066091
 * https://books.google.ch/books?hl=de&lr=&id=F9UuVyGcZ7MC&oi=fnd&pg=PA114&dq=%22licancabur%22&ots=WjMh8qBhz2&sig=jG2zLUp7Hzp8i0ryVX5pE0G0MQE#v=onepage&q=%22licancabur%22&f=false

Potential source
Not sure if https://cuadernosms.cl/index.php/cms/article/download/1517/1479 is worth mentioning. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)