Talk:Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, BWV 32/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 23:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld  23:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Link Darmstadt in lede and history.
 * yes --GA


 * "Lehms treated the Gospel to an allegorical dialogue of Jesus and the Soul, staying close to the Gospel." -avoid rep of Gospel
 * removed the earlier wording at the end --GA


 * Why are the keys in the table all linked except B minor?
 * thank you --GA (because one source had e minor which was linked before, and when I changed I forgot to link)


 * "The keys and time signatures are taken from the book on all cantatas by the Bach scholar Alfred Dürr," -why not just mention the name of the book?
 * Do you think the title conveys how general that book is? meaning that facts about other cantatas can also be sourced to it? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You could word it like "The keys and time signatures are taken from xxx, a book by the Bach scholar Alfred Dürr which features facts about the cantatas".
 * That would be a rather long title in German (Die Kantaten von Johann Sebastian Bach), which is given in the ref anyway, - do you think it helps the English reader at this point? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh OK, don't worry then.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Looks fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)