Talk:LifeArc

AFC review
AFC submission|d|corp|declinets=20130519184820|decliner=SarahStierch|ts=20130515110232|u=Mcdi7sh2|ns=5
 * Sarah, the subject is very clearly notable, it is just a matter of finding the sources that say so. Excluding all UK government sources because the organization works with the govt is somewhat unreasonable - I can't imagine a US body being treated the same way. Failing a quick resolution the material should perhaps be added to the main MRC article. Ref 3 should certainly be allowable. Press releases, especially from quoted companies, are "reliable" for basic factual statements about the organizations making them - where do you think newspapers get their information from? Johnbod (talk) 20:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Sarah, the subject is very clearly notable, it is just a matter of finding the sources that say so. Excluding all UK government sources because the organization works with the govt is somewhat unreasonable - I can't imagine a US body being treated the same way. Failing a quick resolution the material should perhaps be added to the main MRC article. Ref 3 should certainly be allowable. Press releases, especially from quoted companies, are "reliable" for basic factual statements about the organizations making them - where do you think newspapers get their information from? Johnbod (talk) 20:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)