Talk:Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach

Neutrality tag
This article has had a neutrality tag since 2007. What is considered not neutral? Hepcat65 (talk) 09:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Tag removed. -- LWG talk 02:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Harman
It occurs to me that Pearson and Shaw may have shared a portion of the revenue generated by the book with Denham Harman. I believe that a company set up by acquaintances of the pair, recommended as a source in the book, may also have shared a portion of its profits with Harman. If I’m right then Harman had a whopping conflict of interest in recommending the book. I do not have a copy of the book at hand to see if the relationship is mentioned. Nicmart (talk) 02:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)