Talk:Life dynamics inc.

Can some neutral party tell me how to challenge the summary deletion of this article? There was no discussion and not even going through the "speedy deletion" process. I dare not put a full article up because some person or persons will just delete it.

My understanding was that the Wikipedia way is to discuss these things, not to just delete things without any attempt at reconciliation.ChristinaDunigan 19:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

That was fast!
At least we might get a hearing this time!

I want some sort of review of what's going on here. This is not in any way a disparaging article about Life Dynamics. It is merely demonstrating that by having attraced the attention of Planned Parenthood, it is a notable organization. Once I manage to get the article to stay put, then I can flesh it out. But there is absolutely no point in putting hours of work into an article that will likely be nuked without even the courtesy of discussion.

I am trying to get an article up that covers all of LDI's activities and links to both supporters and opponents of those activities.

In a previous incarnation of this discussion, before the article was nuked, I included quite a few links, pro and con.

It is my understanding that there is to be some sort of discussion before nuking articles, and I can't even find out who has been doing the deletion! What sort of recourse do I have?ChristinaDunigan 19:43, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * what is "crude" meant to signify if not an attack?Twospoonfuls 19:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * This article does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy. In striving to connect LDI with Planned Parenthood, you've presented the PP point of view, but not the other side.  NPOV is a non-negotiable policy.  &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 20:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I concur with ERcheck it does not conform to WP:NPOV. Perhaps Prod.-- Dakota 21:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)