Talk:Life in 2050

FACT
This article should not be Titled "Life in 2050" it should be titled "Ulrich Eberl's book about Life in 2050" because that is all that is in this article. An article titled "Life in 2050" should contain material from many books and articles, from many Futurologists, not just one book. Although I could write that article, I just don't have the spare time! Sirswindon (talk) 20:27, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Nonsense. If there were an article about "Life in 2050", we wouldn't call it that, and the book is titled Life in 2050, so that's what we should call the article.  If there is another book titled Life in 2050, we might disambiguate to Life in 2050 (Eberl) and Life in 2050 (other author).  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 01:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It is not Nonsense. I searched Wikipedia for what is available for the future in the year 2050, and what did I get but a book. If what you are telling me is that I or anyone can put an article about a book (as in this case)  and it will  appear as a WIKIPEDIA Article?  Then I can add millions of book titles with short articles onto WIKIPEDIA.  THAT WOULD REALLY RESULT IN NONSENSE! Shouldn't this article be titled: Life in 2050 (Book Title) Sirswindon (talk) 16:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

life in 2050
103.28.132.233 (talk) 07:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)