Talk:Lifeline (Papa Roach song)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Quick fail criteria assessment I'll have to quickfail this article for now due to constant edit wars throughout. Besides edit warring, there are some other problems with the article. The charts and Music video section have no citations. and the website Songfacts probably isn't a valid source. This article also lacks a Credits section. For the vandalism, I'd try this IP on WP:3RR to get rid of him. He's incorrect about removing info that's in the album article, if it relates to this one, it should be here too. For a good idea on how to get an article passed for GA for a song, when re-nominating this, try to base it off of the article for P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing). Good luck next time! Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
 * 2) The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
 * 3) There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
 * 4) The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
 * 5) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * 1) The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
 * 2) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * 1) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * 1) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.