Talk:Liferea

Image
The image is a bit not up to date, isn't it? Especially does it not show the new icon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.133.94.129 (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Rewording Needed
"There are many other news readers available, but some of these are not available for Linux or require extra libraries to be installed." That statement needs to be reworded, or possibly even removed. It does go with what should be expected in an encylopedia. --525252a 05:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Someone must have quoted this from the project homepage.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liferea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303195820/http://liferea.blogspot.com/2007/06/64bit-test.html to http://liferea.blogspot.com/2007/06/64bit-test.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Comparison with other software
"It supports a number of different feed formats including RSS/RDF, CDF, Atom, OCS, and OPML, many of which its contemporaries cannot."

That's a pretty bold statement to make, especially without any sources to back it up, and without explaining what is to be understood by "contemporaries". Feed readers? Browsers? Email programs? Software in general? Most dedicated feed readers do support RSS/RDF, Atom, and OPML. I can imagine support for CDF or OCS is somewhat limited, but that still does not justify the "many" in "many of which" here. MichielN (talk) 21:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)