Talk:Lift Yourself/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 15:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

You guys are the two editors I work with the most, so it will be cool to review an article you guys nominated together. LOVI 33  15:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

May I request we please address the genres in the infobox? I'm not sure if "scat" is considered a music genre. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Request
 * I have contributed to this discussion on the talk page now. --K. Peake 20:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * I am aware that there is currently a discussion going on if "scat" is a musical genre, but are you sure it should be included in the infobox even if it is, as you are referring specifically to West's vocals, not the song itself.
 * Thank you for your awareness and the discussion has been solved by now, though it should have been if classified as a genre because it would not have been writing "scatting" --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Introduce Drake, Smokepurpp, and Pusha T
 * ❌ they are introduced solely in the body so should only be kept as having introductions there --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * "An avant-garde track, the song samples" → "The song is an avant-garde track that includes a sample of" to avoid repeated sentence structure
 * ✅ with changes because I can't say "includes a sample of..." then list two songs directly afterwards --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Confirm that the "proper lyrics" version is unreleased
 * ✅ if this is fine --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Background and development

 * Target "right-wing political views" to Right-wing politics
 * ✅ --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Great prose writing!

Composition

 * Retitle to "Composition and lyrics" to be more specific
 * ✅ but I did not do this initially due to not being sure if it would be needed, as West raps nonsensical words on the song --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Release and reception

 * Target dancehall to itself
 * Target pop to Pop music
 * ✅ --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Commercial performance

 * Merge into 1 paragraph as short paragraphs are discouraged since they can inhibit the flow of the text.
 * ✅ because this can be a one-para section, as the others are all at two or more so an outlier is fine --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Live performances and other usage

 * Looks good!

Track listing

 * Are you sure this section is needed since there is only one track listing?
 * Shouldn't it be included for verification of the length, plus it is not titled track listings? --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Credits and personnel

 * Looks good!

Charts

 * Looks good!

Release history

 * Are you sure this section is needed since there is only one release date?
 * Not required, just thought it would be a neat addition --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Final comments and verdict

 * for now. I just have a few concerns but overall, it is an amazing article and is definitely ready for GA. LOVI  33  16:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I have made the fixes now, are you ready to pass this? --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * definitely! ✅. LOVI  33  17:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)