Talk:Light Attack/Armed Reconnaissance

LAAR vs LAS
This article conflates the LAS and LAAR programs. The LAS (Light Air Support) is Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation #FA8637-10-R-6000. This is the program that the AT-6 lost and that the Super Tucano won. The LAAR (Light Attack/Armed Reconnaissance) Request for Information (RFI) is presolicitation #Light_Attack_Armed_Reconnaissance_(LAAR). Neither of these should be confused with the Advanced Flight Trainer / Light Attack Aircraft (AFT/LAA), Sources Sought solicitation #FA8615-10-R-ZZ01. --Donbock (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Source
There's a lot of information on the subject here, that I don't have time to parse through, but perhaps someone else would find it possible to do so... - The Bushranger (talk) 18:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the link! I'll take a look when I get some free time, unless someone else beats me to it! -SidewinderX (talk) 19:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Additional Information
I was going to add the armament and performance specifications for the competing aircraft, but as another user said it might be better if I were to leave that info on the Planes dedicated wiki pages. Regardless should we put links to the corporations "Light Attack/Armed Reconnaissance" websites dedicated to the competition in a references section? For example http://www.802u.com/ is the Air Tractor page for the AT-802U while Boeing has an OV-10X brochure that has been distributed to the public.

Also should we write a basic description for the A-67 and the M-346. Compared to the others they seem to be lacking.--Lostend (talk) 18:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)


 * If you have links to the aircraft's specific page, feel free to link them in the Light_Attack/Armed_Reconnaissance section. If you have a source, and can cite it, feel free to add desctiptions of the A-67 and the M-346. Although I'd keep it specific to the variant that plans to be proposed for the LAAR (i.e., not the trainer M-346). -SidewinderX (talk) 00:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


 * How about the BuiltForTheMission website? Too adsy? http://builtforthemission.com/las-mission.php Hcobb (talk) 15:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Merging
Shouldnt this article be merged with Counter-insurgency aircraft? Its effectively the same combat type just under a different name?--Blockhaj (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)


 * This article is for a specific procurement program for a COIN aircraft ---EngineeringEditor (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Beechcraft AT-6.jpg