Talk:Light Railway Research Society of Australia

Notability
If there is a need for an extended explanation here as to why this association and its journal are indeed notable, please try a question here and I can answer and qualify.

I have only seen some odd and unsubstantiated claims on the main pages of both items, talk p[ages are for the specific purpose for any taggers top come here and show their understanding of due process as to the veracity of the item JarrahTree 09:57, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I have added additional references which go directly to the notability of the topic - see current ref 4 and ref 5.Garyvines (talk) 12:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't see anything that indicates it passes WP:GNG - specifically that it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
 * Number 5 was an academic paper by Kevin J. Frawley. The text in the article was an almost verbatim copy/paste, but the source could be used to support notability.  I've removed the copyright violation and we should figure out how to use his claim that the Society has done good research.   The Dissident Aggressor 15:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)