Talk:Light of Hope

CSD
Hi. In what way does this not constitute 'unambiguous advertising'? Regards, Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 15:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Its just not spam, also see its been significantly edited by a senior editor who obviously does not regard it as spam, Atlantic306 (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not happy with the article, and considered nominating it for deletion, but decided that was not the appropriate approach. It cites only one independent, reliable source, but at least half-a-dozen others exist, listed in the further reading section. Deletion is not cleanup. The article needs to be rewritten using those sources. Feel free to take a stab at it. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I've edited the current version for the time-being so its more neutral but agree a full re-write using the extra sources is needed, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2019 (UTC)