Talk:Like Flies on Sherbert

Critical reception
The sentence regarding the deliberately sloppy and below-par performance and recording of the album is not a critique of the record. It is clearly explained with quotes that the substandard quality was deliberate. Likewise the debate about the quality of the album is subsequently clarified by balanced quotes from reviews.

The idea that 1970 preceded this album is nonsensical since it was released afterwards. It may have been recorded first but was clearly released afterwards. I've made a change to the lead paragraph to reflect that. Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:13, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, how about 'One Day in New York', from 1978? It is listed as his first both in his wiki page and the template below. There's no page for that album in wikipedia, couldn't check from there. 82.141.73.168 (talk) 18:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)


 * It's a pretty obscure album, and its original 1978 release was apparently in Japan only. I'm not sure how official it was. Can't seem to find out much about it. Maybe if someone can unearth some more details, we can verify that it was his first release. Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)


 * 'One Day in New York' was originally intented to be released as a LP on New York's proto-punk label Ork Records but that never happened, only some tracks were used for Chilton's 'Singer not the Song' EP. Producer Jon Tiven eventually sold the studio recordings to Trio Music in Japan and Line Records in Germany ('Bach's Bottom') -- likely legally but whithout Chilton's consent. The Trio Music version added some tracks recorded live at CBGB's in 1977. These infos are from an Chilton interview with a french magazine I read in the 80s and since I cannot find some other sources I leave them to the Discussion page... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roddem (talk • contribs) 11:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Track listing
I own both versions of the original LP, so I will add the Peabody version of this record. The track listing in the article now is for the Aura version. I see no problem with listing it as such. JeffConn (talk) 02:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)