Talk:Like a Virgin (album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  SabreBD  (talk)  01:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

I am getting started on this one (its been delayed quite enough), but its a big article so it may take me a little time.-- SabreBD  (talk)  01:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for starting to review this Sabred. :) --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Generally well written and generally complies sufficiently with the MoS, but there are a couple of minor points with WP:Lead. See also the advisory suggestions given below.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All online references are live links.
 * The article is very well referenced.
 * Sources all appear to be reliable.
 * All sources that can be linked support the cited statements.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage of important aspects of the subjects life and career.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * All the major aspects appear to be covered. Its a long article (but once tables etc are removed not above the normal limit) by album article standards, but then this a very significant album.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * It appears fair and un-biased.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable, no edit warring.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Some good use of images here, within the usual copyright limitations.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

MOS issues: Advice for improvement:
 * The importance of the subject may not be immediately clear to a casual reader, as the MOS suggests it should. This could be resolved by a second sentence in the lead explaining that this was her breakthrough album and mentioning its cultural significance.
 * Agreed. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 08:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Some underlinking (Chic (band) and Bernard Edwards (presumably, as his first name not give in lead) are not linked in the lead. I am one of those editors who is happy for things to be linked in the lead and then again the first time they appear in the main text - but that is just an opinion. In any case, they should be linked in the lead as this is the first instance.
 * Agreed and done. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 08:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The article is generally well written, but, apart from occasional minor slips, there was a lot of repetition, extraneous commas, and sometimes the prose did not flow as it should (this is often the product of a lot of additions and revisions): eg. (from Background):


 * "A former dancer and fixture on the New York club scene, Madonna Louise Ciccone became known to the world simply as Madonna, with the release of her 1983 self-titled debut album Madonna. The album, fueled by its hit songs like "Holiday", "Borderline" and "Lucky Star", was one of the best selling albums of 1983, and helped Madonna become one of the most exciting new artist of the '80s."

Would read better as:
 * "A former dancer and fixture on the New York club scene, Madonna Louise Ciccone became known to the world simply as Madonna with the release of her 1983 self-titled debut album. Fueled by hit songs like "Holiday", "Borderline" and "Lucky Star", the album was one of the best selling of the year and helped her become one of the most exciting new artists of the '80s."

or (from Legacy)


 * "Material Girl" is the song which Madonna said that she most regrets recording, as it became a label that has been attached to her for decades. She also said if she had known this, she probably would have never recorded it."

Could be:
 * "Madonna has stated that the song she most regrets recording is "Material Girl" and if she had known that the label would be attached to her for decades, she would probably never have done so."

Apart from the odd slip, none of this is ungrammatical, but it could read better and be quite a bit shorter. This is a pretty big job and regular editors may need someone to come in and do this, as it is hard to see this kind of stuff when you have gotten used to the article. This is just a suggestion, but editors may want to think about it before moving to FA status.
 * I gave a copy edit of it. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 08:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Another minor point (and not a bar to GA status) is that references have a slight inconsistency as those that are weblinks have full stops/periods at the end of the note, but those to books do not. Every example I can see in WP:CITE have full stops at the end, so it is safest to put them in.-- SabreBD  (talk)  11:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * This was the point which I don't know how to address. I am using the harvnb template for the book references. The harvnb template doesnot add a period in the end, and in other articles also I have seen that book references are kept like that. So is it that necessary? — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 08:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)