Talk:Lili (1953 film)

The Seven Souls of Clement O'Reilly
So far I haven't been able to find out anything about this story, if it, in fact, exists. It is what ibdb credits as one of the sources for the libretto of Carnival! Another editor has suggested that this is simply a mistake, and that the correct origin is "The Man Who Hated People." I have a copy of this story now and will be writing something about it eventually; it certainly is a version of the Lili story.

But did Gallico write another story on this theme, under the title "The Seven Souls of Clement O'Reilly?"

Any information on this would be welcome.

It would also be nice to understand what material Helen Deutsch was adapting. Did she start with "Love of Seven Dolls" or something similar, or did Gallico actually write a considerably-changed dark-toned adaptation of the story after the screenplay was in progress? Certainly the mood of Lili is closer to "The Man Who Hated People" than to "Love of Seven Dolls." Dpbsmith (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

If you Google "The Seven Souls of Clement O'Reilly", you will find that it was an early title for the movie that turned out to be "Lili". There are press announcements that it will star Fernando Lamas and Pier Angeli. What seems quite likely to me is that TSSOCOR is Gallico's first, unpublished adaptation of his "The Man Who Hated People" short story. Helen Deutsch adapted TSSOCOR into "Lili", and Gallico further adapted TSSOCOR into "Love of Seven Dolls". This perfectly explains the clearly non-coincidental elements shared by "Lili" and LOSD that do not derive directly from TMWHP. And how "Lili" can seem to be inspired by a novella that was published the year after the movie premiered.

So: Gallico wrote "The Man Who Hated People". He then adapted that into "The Seven Souls of Clement O'Reilly". This unpublished story was adapted by Helen Deutsch into "Lili", and by Gallico himself into "Love of Seven Dolls". And finally, "Carnival" was adapted from "Lili". That's my theory. Galenfott (talk) 03:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lili dvdcover.jpg
Image:Lili dvdcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

"Influence"
I have removed the section entitled Influence as it did not concern, as one might expect, this film's influence on subsequent films, but merely the reactions of Audrey Hepburn and John Waters to the movie. The information has been transfered to their biographies, a more appropriate venue. B00P (talk) 10:12, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Early smiley emoticon
I've deleted this section. "An early instance of using text characters to represent a sideways smiling (and frowning) face occurred in an advertisement for Lili in the New York Herald Tribune, March 10, 1953, pg. 20, cols. 4-6. (See Emoticon.)"

The attached picture contains a smiley face, but it is not textual (or sideways) and not an emoticon.

The ad can be added back in if someone wants, because it may still be relevant. 68.8.184.80 (talk) 18:09, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Lili. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030611220020/http://lists.village.virginia.edu/cgi-bin/spoons/archive1.pl?list=puptcrit.archive%2Fpuptcrit_1998%2Fpuptcrit.9805 to http://lists.village.virginia.edu/cgi-bin/spoons/archive1.pl?list=puptcrit.archive%2Fpuptcrit_1998%2Fpuptcrit.9805

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Lili. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20131206151720/http://awardsdatabase.oscars.org/ampas_awards/DisplayMain.jsp?curTime=1386288255217 to http://awardsdatabase.oscars.org/ampas_awards/DisplayMain.jsp?curTime=1386288255217

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Sigh ... is it Marcus or Marc???
Sheeeesh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.102.4 (talk) 07:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 30 December 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  αvírαm  | (tαlk) 07:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

– Not primary over all topics reasonably sought by searching "Lili", including many people by that name. While the film gets a healthy number of pageviews (about 100/day – Hurricane Lili gets half that), Google Scholar and Books searches for lili -author:lili return nothing about the film in the first few pages of results. (Lili (1917 film) seems obscure enough to be irrelevant per WP:PDABPRIMARY.) Hameltion (talk &#124; contribs) 06:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Lili → Lili (film)
 * Lili (disambiguation) → Lili
 * The comparison between all-time mass views for Lili and all-time mass views for Lili (given name) indicates this is yet another case where the there's a mass of pretty random biographies the interest in which receives several orders of magnitudes more readership than the assumed primary topic, meaning this is an obvious deviation from the WP:PTOPIC guideline. Keeping these biographies at 2 clicks away from the readers who look up these people's names is just bad and wrong. (Support) For reference, https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Lili indicates that in October '23 there was 2.5k total incoming, 569 total outgoing, of which 44 to the hatnote (~2% and ~8% respectively), which isn't conclusive by itself. --Joy (talk) 08:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Support I was shocked when I searched for the term and ended up on a film article.★Trekker (talk) 20:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Support. I agree that it's appropriate to title this page as the film. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Support. I agree with the above discussion that the film is not the primary topic. Aoba47 (talk) 02:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Post-RM comment
I'll note that the article title Lili (film) is in violation of the WP:PRIMARYFILM naming convention, which disallows any and all PDABs. 162 etc. (talk) 21:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 8 January 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) –  17:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Lili (film) → Lili (1953 film) – Dab from Lili (1917 film) * Pppery * it has begun... 17:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per WP:PRIMARYFILM. 162 etc. (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination and 162 etc. Lili (film) is incomplete disambiguation and should redirect to the Lili disambiguation page. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 15:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)