Talk:Lima Metropolitan Cathedral

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cathedral Basilica of St. John the Apostle and Evangelist, Lima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513082249/http://www.arzobispadodelima.org/iglesias/catedral/datos.htm to http://www.arzobispadodelima.org/iglesias/catedral/datos.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071018022848/http://www.arzobispadodelima.org/iglesias/catedral/ to http://www.arzobispadodelima.org/iglesias/catedral/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:37, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Bandera de Lima.png

Article title "Lima Cathedral"
The most common search name is Lima Cathedral, but not Basilica Cathedral of Lima, even so it is found on wikis in other languages such as Wikipedia in Spanish or Wikipedia in Portuguese. The transfer had already been done but it was undone twice and it is requested that it be discussed first. In any case, if someone has any objection regarding the transfer of the article, please leave it here, otherwise and if there are no objections in the next few days, it would be advisable to transfer the article to the one with the title Lima Cathedral. Carlos Pozo (talk) 18:33, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Just for reference, the move being discussed is from this page to Lima Cathedral, currently a redirect to this page. Lithopsian (talk) 15:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I am neutral on the name change itself. However, opening a plain discussion here may not be the best approach: it isn't the recommended way to discuss a page move; it isn't a highly-watched page and a discussion without the appropriate templates may not attract much attention; at the end of it all, you still won't be able to rename the page because the intended target has non-trivial history and the move command will fail (unless you secretly harbour special privileges), whereas a formal discussion will (usually) be closed by an admin and any agreed moves will be made by them.  Lithopsian (talk) 15:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)