Talk:Limited liability company/Archives/2017

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Limited liability company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610101640/http://www.fipa.gov.ba/local_v2/default.asp to http://fipa.gov.ba/local_v2/default.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100616201002/http://fifoost.org/bulgarien/recht/en/commerce_law/Commerce-Law.pdf to http://www.fifoost.org/bulgarien/recht/en/commerce_law/Commerce-Law.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305181452/https://www.sunarp.gob.pe/Aten24h/pdf/Anexo02.pdf to http://www.sunarp.gob.pe/Aten24h/pdf/Anexo02.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120305050100/http://www.russianlawonline.com/content/russia-form-doing-business-limited-liability-company to http://www.russianlawonline.com/content/russia-form-doing-business-limited-liability-company
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100818193651/https://www.bolagsverket.se/foretag/aktiebolag/ to http://bolagsverket.se/foretag/aktiebolag/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120215215559/http://www.bolagsverket.se/foretag/aktiebolag/starta_aktiebolag/privat_eller_publikt/publika_aktiebolag/ to http://www.bolagsverket.se/foretag/aktiebolag/starta_aktiebolag/privat_eller_publikt/publika_aktiebolag/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:47, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

International equivalents
I suspect that many of the "international equivalents" are not in fact equivalent. Someone with domain knowledge needs to clean this up. --Macrakis (talk) 12:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree. The section for Poland, for instance, says:


 * In Poland, a limited liability company is referred to literally as “company with limited liability”...however Sp. z o.o. has a separate from its owners legal personality what gives ability to certain actions by law and it is considered as an "corporation".


 * Broken English aside, there's no mention of whether the pass-through taxation aspect applies here, and I think what's being said towards the last is that they are considered to be corporations and thus legal entities. If that's the case, and there's no pass-through taxation, then what's being described here is just a corporation being called by a different name.  Ormewood (talk) 01:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

The text under Netherlands describes an unlimited liability organization. It should not be on this page. I will remove the entry 7 days from signing unless someone objects here. Jethrogb (talk) 23:49, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * This relates to a merge discussion that has been running for some time over on Talk:Private limited company. Not that much of the disputed content has now been moved over there, where it can be categorized more broadly, rather than being classed as an American equivalent. Klbrain (talk) 22:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)