Talk:Lin Pey-Chwen

G2's comments and suggestions
We think that overall is good and clear. But in your artworks section, you mentioned her experiences of developing feminist consciousness. We think you can make a new section to talk her experiences. Elainehsiehh (talk) 01:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

We are G6
super good and a lot of citations, however I have found citation(s) that are maybe not that ok (for example citation 20) BeeJazz01 (talk) 02:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

G3's Comments and Suggestions
We would like to suggest the topics should all be formally written with the same format. ("Early life and career" should changed equally to the same format as the other ones with big letters such as "Selected Exhibition") Khallouangel (talk) 02:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

G4 Comment
Our group thinks their structure is well-established. In addition, their content is rich and based on many reliable references. For suggestion, they can write about the artist’s style or even some influences. Katalinchao (talk) 02:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments from Group 5
Overall, the article is well-organized and it has a logical structure. The sources are accessible and varied to support their article. One of the problem we found was that there’s an adverb in the fourth paragraph of Artwork. “ The flawlessly perfect and hairless Eve”, the word flawlessly should be provided with the source. Yuchun152412 (talk) 02:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)