Talk:Linda Hogan (TV personality)

Title should be changed "Linda Hogan"
This Wikipedia article's title should be changed from "Linda Bollea" to "Linda Hogan (reality television personality)", as that's the name she's known by. --12.30.109.2 (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

2012 DUI arrest & 2013 conviction

 * http://www.tmz.com/2013/08/18/linda-hogan-dui-champagne-arrest-guilty-plea/
 * http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2396755/Linda-Hogan-finally-pleads-guilty-DUI-denying-driven-drunk.html
 * http://www.eonline.com/news/351706/linda-hogan-arrested-for-dui-on-same-day-ex-husband-hulk-s-sex-tape-leaked
 * http://abc7.com/archive/8837461/
 * http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/10/linda-hogan-was-in-hospital-shortly-before-dui-arrest.html

She was sentenced to three years of probation. --12.30.109.2 (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Requested move
Linda Bollea → Linda Hogan (TV personality) – Linda Hogan is her WP:COMMONNAME. LM2000 (talk) 23:49, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Moved as requested, per lack of opposition and per other comments above showing "Linda Hogan" in use after her divorce. Dekimasu よ! 00:19, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linda Hogan (TV personality). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071122132921/http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=c78966c5-7617-41c8-a049-87cc49532f5d to http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=c78966c5-7617-41c8-a049-87cc49532f5d

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:32, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Repeated removal of notability
The IP editor who repeatedly removes the section about what she is known for really should attempt to make a case for themselves since so far they have only repeat their old argument twice after having it countered, said "don't make me repeat myself" (bordeline intimidation there I see, nice) and nothing the latest time. Why should it be removed when it's clear that just becuse you know somehting it doesn't mean everybody does. Your entire logic is faulty.★Trekker (talk) 02:24, 21 June 2017 (UTC)