Talk:Lindsay Lohan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

-- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking it on- you know I appreciate it (even if you do owe me a favour! :p) and I'll get to work on those later on! HJ Mitchell  |  Penny for your thoughts?   18:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

re: criteria 2
For some reason my reply section 2 is invisible above, so I'm reposting it here: The Newsday reference can be verified through google news archives: However, since it is a newspaper reference, it shouldn't need an online link, so I removed it. (and the deadref template.) Looking up the ref, I noticed that the sentence here was a direct unattributed quote from Newsday, so I rewrote it to avoid copyvio/plagiarism issues. It would also be possible to replace the 2005 separation reference with this or this People reference, but they only mention a "2005 separation", not December or that they signed a separation agreement. By the way, if you look at the article when it was featured, it wouldn't even come close to satisfying GA standards now. Standards were really different in 2006. Siawase (talk) 15:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've fixed the formatting so your comment shows up (I could have sworn I put nowiki tags around the pipe in my sig, but I've changed the code now anyway). As for the ref, it might be worth sticking in one of the People refs just for ease of verification. I'm working through this as time allows- I'm even busier than normal atm so apologies for the slow progress. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

GA pass
Thank you to HJ Mitchell and an odd name, and whomever I forgot to mention, for working so hard to get this article to GA, because I have gone off and promoted the article. Congrats. ;) If anyone out there feels that this review is in error of some sort, please feel free to take it to a GA review reassessment. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  21:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no problems with the review, but could you please put the GA pass in the article history instead of in its own template? It's better to have the whole article history in one place. Lampman (talk) 21:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, I realise that was being done almost at the exact same moment as I wrote the above message. Thanks! Lampman (talk) 22:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)