Talk:Line 4 (Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano)

Requested move 3 October 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Line 4 (Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano). Consensus has coalesced around this alternative and it matches the recent moves of lines 1–3. (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Line 4 of the Guadalajara urban rail system → Line 3, Guadalajara Urban Electric Train System – Clarity NorthWestPianoShrimp319 (talk) 12:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I cannot close this as move as there is no rationale given in terms of WP:NC. — Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Move to Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano (Line 4). The name of the article on the system is Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano. See Talk:Line 1 of the Guadalajara urban rail system. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with this, as it is the naming scheme that has been adopted for the articles on lines 1, 2 and 3. On the closure notice in the talk page for the article on line 3, there is rationale given in terms of various policies. NorthWestPianoShrimp319 (talk) 23:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I recall the naming was the opposite. It should be Line 4 (Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano). SistemaRayoXP (talk) 23:33, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If that is how all the other lines' articles have been renamed, then I support this. NorthWestPianoShrimp319 (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is actually correct. I support this alternative. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)