Talk:Line of Actual Control/Archive 1

Untitled
why is this a sub-indian article when its a chinese territory? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.231.244.232 (talk) 14:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Line of Actual Control. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.centurychina.com/plaboard/uploads/1962war.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717201203/http://www.osaarchivum.org/files/holdings/300/8/3/text/10-3-106.shtml to http://www.osaarchivum.org/files/holdings/300/8/3/text/10-3-106.shtml
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130724185744/http://defencenews.in/defence-news-internal.asp?get=new&id=1554 to http://www.defencenews.in/defence-news-internal.asp?get=new&id=1554

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Reach line of actual control?
, you say XD come on, every Line of Actual Control is existed only after conquer of a place. how come it exist before conquer. An Indian don't have the quality to judge language level of wiki user. Your mother tongue is hindi not english.

I am afraid this is wrong logic and completely irrelevant. Your wording "Chinese forces...reached the Line of Actual Control" implies that the Line existed before the Chinese forces reached them, which is not the case by your own admission. So your wording is completely inappropriate.

You should also focus on discussing content, and refrain from discussing editors. A repeat of this kind of behviour will invite sanctions. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC)


 * thank for pointing out. this sentence is actually unfinished. my point is, please mind the topic of this article is LAC, not different clamming lines. focus on topic, LAC is a more appropriate wording.
 * the reason for showing this map is to show the "LAC".--樂號 (talk) 04:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The point is fine. But the edit is not. You will have to figure out how to word it so that it is not misleading. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Misinformation regarding the length of the LAC in Ladakh
According to Lt Gen Panag,

I have also seen a similar claim, in a more garbled form from P. Stobdan.

However this is incorrect. It assumes that the international border prevails in the Demchok sector. It does not. The international maps only show the Indian and Chinese claim lines there, neither of which is operative. There is an LAC in the middle, which the map-makers don't know about.

Leaving this out, one finds only about 30-40km in the middle (shown here on Google maps) and about 120–150 km in the south (shown here) as genuine international border. The rest is LAC. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:28, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Demchok area
Change Indian administered Ladakh /LAC map slightly as area east of Demchok is under administration of China since 1962 war

Change Indian administered Ladakh /LAC map slightly as area east of Demchok is under administration of China since 1962 war. Please greyed out that area east of Demchok. Sources: BBC, New Indian Express — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritabharidevi (talk • contribs) 11:35, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

India Today, Times of India, twitter, India Today, NDTV --Ritabharidevi (talk) 08:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The CIA map in the infobox does not show the LAC at Demchok. It only shows two claim lines. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:10, 12 September 2020 (UTC)