Talk:Lingnan University

Bias/Propaganda
This entry is biased. For example, consider the section on the RAE 2014. We learn only what the good results were (in the University's opinion, I presume). We don't see a balanced presentation of the data, and information on areas of relative weakness.

My own view is that this article has been edited by someone within the University, with the aim of bolstering its reputation. It's especially sad that they should resort to presenting selective evidence, when they allegedly seek to foster critical thinking ability in their students.

(Note also that key controversies over recent years are no longer covered in the 'Controversies' section. See, for example, https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1878896/lingnan-financial-chief-quits-over-credentials)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.46.79.250 (talk) 01:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)