Talk:Lion-class battleship/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk • message • contribs • count  • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= logs ] • email)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Any idea if the completed guns were ever used (for coastal artillery, railway guns, etc.?) Parsecboy (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Any possibility of scanning a line-drawing in from Conway's/Garzke & Dulin/etc.? Fair Use should be applicable here. Parsecboy (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Looks good for GA to me.
 * Any possibility of scanning a line-drawing in from Conway's/Garzke & Dulin/etc.? Fair Use should be applicable here. Parsecboy (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Looks good for GA to me.