Talk:Lionel Wendt

Untitled
There is no copyright violation. Please don't delete necessary information. if somebody see violation of copyrights, please rewrite this article include those information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.135.132.255 (talk) 04:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Please stop reinserting the same material. Any content added to this or any other article must be written entirely from scratch. Any text which closely paraphrases copyrighted content will be removed. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://lionelwendt.org/ and http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~lkawgw/gen1100.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Continuing
I have blanked the content you re-added to the article because it still contained close paraphrasing of the source. For some examples just using the sources I saw earlier, the article says:

While the source says:

And shortly after that, the article reads:

And the source:

Many other instances also follow too closely. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. The less creative the expression, the looser copyright applies, but even so close paraphrasing becomes a great concern when there are long passages that include fragments of the original and the structure of the original is retained. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". VernoWhitney (talk) 14:43, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I have reedited this article with out copy rights violations--Wipeouting (talk) 19:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I have explained some concerns with the rewrite at your talk page and offered a suggestion for moving forward. I'll be happy to talk to you about it more there. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:24, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20110717072028/http://www.tonpeek.com/wendtintro.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:17, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lionel Wendt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724160532/http://www.lionelwendt.nl/ to http://www.lionelwendt.nl/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707170748/http://www.artsyscience.com/nude-lionel-wendt/ to http://www.artsyscience.com/nude-lionel-wendt/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)