Talk:Lipid raft/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I find this article does not meet WP:Good article criteria because of multiple problems with citations and references. I have tried to correct citation formatting errors (which is a minor detail, but something that a good article should have), but there are a lot of them. The major concern is that there are many statements that are not supported by references. I do not have the expertise to find these. The article could also use a thorough copy edit.

I am also concerned that there is no documented GA review of this article. Did someone simply list it as "GA class" on the talk page without a formal review? -- Tea with toast  (talk)  21:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * From the history, it seems that promotion to B-class and later to GA-class was done without review. But could you be more specific about what is wrong with the formatting and which statements lack citations? Thanks. --Mashin6 (talk) 00:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)


 * If it was listed without a review, which it appears it was, then it should certainly be delisted for the moment. SmartSE (talk) 16:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)