Talk:Lisa Blue Baron

I propose that this page be deleted. Lisa Blue is not a notable figure by wikipedia standards unless it’s for all the things he she has done to abuse the law which is suspiciously missing. If the article stays, it should definitely list all of the public legal problems she’s caused, eg she was indicted and pled to not self incriminate for asking the Mayor of Dallas to prosecute someone for their political and monetary gain. It doesn’t mention what Elizabeth Edwards said to her about betrayal as Lisa worked to hide John Edwards’ affair as written in a book. It doesn’t mention the time she referred to a black lawyer at at a law conference in a derogatory way. It doesnt include the lawsuits filed against her for fraud, tax evasion and other illegal matters. It doesn’t mention any of the facts regarding the life insurance policy she changed into her own name on a date after the death of the policy holder. This article not only leaves out more than it has in it, it’s not correct because the value that presumably makes Lisa Blue a notable human being was originally credited to my father but she has since attempted to usurp those credits apparently for herself. Yet the article makes no mention of what she personally did in any of these cases. Almost nothing in this article is verified. If being on a legal team that wins money is notable, then every lawyer should have a Wikipedia page. If they should, they should be ready to face the facts and not try to keep 100% of all the controversial facts out. 2601:281:8180:1F10:CCAE:A938:C2C7:7CAA (talk) 17:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * It was Fred Baron who was a top democratic fundraiser. She regularly stated that it was all him and it was, fundraising was not her thing. She was not a top fundraiser, and the article doesn’t mention any work she did. It was Fred Baron who did that work. In each instance that it says what she did that seems notable because there was money, there is nothing notable in the article that can be attributed to her. It says she won a case and attributes the case win to her but she was on a team and the only noteworthy aspect of the case that is mentioned is that she made money. Nowhere does it show what she did for the world that was positive. She was elected as a president to an org that my father funded. Is that noteworthy? What did she do with that privilege? The article makes no mention. If you have a closer look, it’s pretty obvious this is a great example of how article on Wikipedia can be gamed and controlled, eg it’s so shiny and nice but mentioned nothing of her wrongdoings which stack up. And it mentioned nothing she did personally on her own or how her contributions helped people. Where is the proof she is a philanthropist and doesn’t just give away tax money she writes off that she’d have to pay anyway? 2601:281:8180:1F10:CCAE:A938:C2C7:7CAA (talk) 17:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)