Talk:Lisa Sauermann

Why does this article exist? Evidence why it shouldn't: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Iurie_Boreico http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Peter_Scholze http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Darij_Grinberg etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.75.46.166 (talk) 11:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * In November 2014 she uploaded her first paper on arXiv: "On the μ-admissible set in the extended affine Weyl groups of E6 and E7", which is about a question proposed by R. Kottwitz and M. Rapoport in 2000.[6]
 * I actually came here looking for information on Lisa Sauermann, after watching a video on a mathematical problem where she is mentioned: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M64HUIJFTZM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.76.114.205 (talk) 18:20, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

I think this sentence is really irrelevant and should be deleted. Wikipedia is not a news ticker for papers uploaded to arxiv; note that arxiv uploads are not subject to refereeing (although there is some minimal quality control). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.220.132.179 (talk) 12:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

This feels like a somewhat irrelevant article. She is good, but has at this point done nothing to merit a Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.225.98.205 (talk) 13:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

I feel that a biography of an up-and-coming mathematician should not start with information about what she did in high school. Rather, I think the article should start with the most important things she has done so far. However, not being versed in the lore of Wikipedia, I was loath to jump in there and start re-ordering things. Is there a "correct" way to do this kind of thing? or to propose a change rather than just make it directly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.42.84.125 (talk) 07:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)