Talk:Lisa the Beauty Queen/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lisa the Beauty Queen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Congratulations! Lisa the Beauty Queen has met all the criteria to become a good article. Thanks to all who contributed! I will leave the updating of the talk page templates to the top contributor.  Limetolime  talk to me • look what I did! 20:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Please take a look at Lisa the Skeptic. It is a featured article, and if users use this as a guide, Lisa the Beauty Queen will become an FA in no time!  Limetolime  talk to me • look what I did! 00:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)