Talk:Lise de Baissac

Reference error
, the bibliographic information for O'Connor 2012 is already present in the article, in the sources section. Your introduction of it a second time is placing the article in Category:Harv and Sfn multiple-target errors, since the short footnotes now don't know which entry to link to. There are several possible ways to fix this error: I would suggest that options 1 or 3 are the best, but I leave the choice up to you. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 09:24, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Undo your most recent edit, so that all of the short footnotes link to the entry in the sources list,
 * 2) Remove the entry in the sources list, so that all of the short footnotes link to the first long-form reference that mentions the source,
 * 3) Mark one of the citation templates (either the one in the sources list or the first long-form reference) with , to stop it generating the reference anchor, or
 * 4) Convert all of the O'Connor 2012 footnotes to long-form references.
 * Thanks. Option one seemed the easiest choice. I didn't have a clue what the problem was. You've told me more clearly than anything I could find on wikipedia help.Smallchief (talk)
 * Thanks for the fix! Short footnotes are great when they work but baffling when they don't, in my experience - most of my (rather limited) editing at the moment is tidying up problems with them.  And thank-you for a most interesting article; de Baissac sounds like a remarkable person.  Best, Wham2001 (talk) 11:23, 9 May 2021 (UTC)