Talk:List of AMD Turion processors

AMD Family
Wold be nice if the family name (6, 15, 16 or 17) of each chip where specified.

article title
Perhaps this this article should be named "List of AMD Turion 64 microprocessors". After all the Turion article is about something different. (Personally, I think separating Turion 64 and Turion 64 X2 was a bad choice.) DHR 07:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

You are not currently logged in. If you save any edits, your IP address will be recorded publicly in this page's edit history. If you create an account, you can conceal your IP address and be provided with many other benefits. Messages sent to your IP can be viewed on your talk page. Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox.

error?
The CPUs listed under Turion 64 X2 "Trinidad" are actualy "Taylor" for Socket S1. http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/notebook/SideBySide.aspx?opn=TMDTL56HAX5CT&opn=TMDTL52HAX5CT
 * I'm not sure what you're trying to show with that link. I don't see anything that lists the codenames there... jgp TC 10:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Dates
Out of curiousity why are the dates in different formats? cKaL 20:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Because not all of the dates are wikilinked, and you have your preferences set to display dates in something other than US style. — Aluvus   t / c  20:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

What is "Turion K8" (not Athlon 64..)
I've seen some articles that mention

"With the exceptions of Sempron-branded processors and Turion K8 Rev E processors, all notebook processors shipped by AMD include AMD-V and therefore support Windows 7 XP mode"

But I cannot find Turion K8 anywhere here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.207.3 (talk) 00:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Dual vs. single core
There are Headlines: Single-core Mobile processors

Dual-Core Mobile processors

Then there are single and dual cores listet in the same table: this is misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.153.44.113 (talk) 20:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Outdated?
Why is the article outdated? Somebody added that in may 2010, can i remove the outdated-section now? Or give a reason for it being outdated, please... --here@llyis@dj (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Coordination
The tables do not seem to be coordinated with those in the Phenom article. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 17:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)