Talk:List of ATP Big Titles singles champions

chronology
I think it's great idea but the table should look like this, slam wins in capital /bold/ letters and all in chronologicl order

AO-m1-m2-m3-m4-m5-RG-WIM-m6-m7-USO-m8-m9-ATP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.139.55.211 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:30, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

One question? Who is del Porto? 82.141.65.90 (talk) 00:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Olympics
I am aware that the Olympics are traditionally not held in high regard among tennis fans. Still, I think most would consider them at least as significant as Masters tournaments. Therefore I propose them to be included here, perhaps as an extra column on the far right. Conveniently, tennis at the Olympics was reintroduced in 1988, shortly before the start of the ATP tour. Gap9551 (talk) 17:14, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I added the column. Gap9551 (talk) 13:59, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of ATP Tour Top-level tournament singles champions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5ioXk9iBm?url=http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tournaments/Tournament-Landing.aspx to http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tournaments/Tournament-Landing.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Flip chronologically
Charts in tennis and elsewhere are traditionally done in yearly chronological order (earliest to latest event). This should do the same and be flipped. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed split of wide tables
These tables are very wide and nearly all readers need a lot of horizontal scrolling: The scroll bar is below the tables and most readers first have to scroll down to find it. I suggest to split each table into two tables in separate sections. First table: Grand slams, year-end, Olympics (six events in total). Second table: Masters Series (ATP, 9 events) and Tier 1 (WTA, 10 events). The first table is the more important events and many readers may only be insterested in that. I'm notifying the other talk pages of this proposal. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * List of ATP Tour top-level tournament singles champions
 * List of ATP Tour top-level tournament doubles champions
 * List of WTA Tour top-level tournament singles champions
 * List of WTA Tour top-level tournament doubles champions

On mobile, readers can only see two full columns at a time so I’m not sure how splitting the table helps. With two tables you’d still have to scroll but instead of scrolling one table, you’ve got two to scroll and that is not better than what we have here honestly. The scroll bar on desktop is at the bottom of the table but readers have to scroll down anyway to see the winners of 2022 so it doesn’t matter as they would always scroll down and always find the scroll bar just under the ongoing season. I think we should keep it as one table but you can maybe remove the flagicons?, that should make the table not wide. I’d still keep the flagicons as I have no issue with scrolling and I’d need to scroll with or without flag icons but they are not important. Horravah (talk) 15:16, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

List big titles
Wouldn't it be better if the list below would only show the winners from 1990? Then, Becker, Edberg and Lendl would be on lower numbers. Just like in the table above!

And that we would add from 1990 more clearer? Sportfan82 (talk) 09:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)