Talk:List of Android launchers

Other launchers
HTC Sense, One UI. All of those kind software are "launchers". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.33.115.90 (talk) 19:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

list not latest
list not latest. launchers such as HOLO launcher are not listed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhinya (talk • contribs) 08:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Also lightning launcher is no longer free and sslauncher developer has changed to total launcher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:4EE0:E96:39D4:C718:FBC6:231A (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Features table
Would it make sense to include a Features table? Most of the launchers have features in common, such as hiding apps from the drawer, changing the icons, etc. (Of course, a truly exhaustive table including the "long tail" of features would be impracticable, but the most common ones should cover the great majority of launchers). Thoughts? --Waldir talk 14:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Inclusion criteria
We should follow general Wikipedia practice for articles like this (see WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC and WP:WTAF) and only list launchers that are notable by Wikipedia standards (see WP:GNG). Basically, significant coverage by at least two reliable sources. In practice this means the launcher should get an article first (passing notability requirements) and then add the link here. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 13:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Add new launcher
9 Cards https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fortysevendeg.ninecardslauncher https://github.com/47deg/nine-cards-v2 http://www.9cards.io/

How can I be allowed to edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shark-oxi (talk • contribs)
 * How is this notable? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * It uses Moments and this is open-source. Shark-oxi (talk) 16:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * How does that mean it is notable though? Please read WP:CSC. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes 9 cards interface is uncommon and open-source android launcher are rare. That's also rare that android app are built with Scala. So I think this is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shark-oxi (talk • contribs)

In Wikipedia notable has a specific meaning as stated at Notability. Whether it is uncommon or rare is not relevant unless mentioned by the WP:RSs. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Significant coverage: 100,000 - 500,000, Reliable : open-source so verifiable, Sources & Presumed : no secondary sources but a lot of app here don't have too and that mean wikipedia is only for famous things, Independent of the subject: I am. Why did you reverted my contribution? or why didn't you removed EverythingMe, OpenLauncher that doesn't have any sources? I truly don't understand. --Shark-oxi (talk) 18:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by 100,000 - 500,000 in regards to significant coverage? App downloads?
 * What do you mean by Reliable : open-source so verifiable? Whether it is open source or closed source is irrelevant in regards to notability.
 * If apps here don't have any secondary sources at the moment please add (template:citation needed) and if none is given or found then we shall remove them too. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If apps here don't have any secondary sources at the moment please add (template:citation needed) and if none is given or found then we shall remove them too. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Pear Launcher and it's irrelevancy
As stated and done before, Pear Launcher doesn't meet the guidelines for notability, which makes it's entry irrelevant in my opinion and was stated by others in a similar topic before: "If apps here don't have any secondary sources at the moment please add (..) and if none is given or found then we shall remove them too." Divadsn (talk) 21:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Baldphone launcher
Was Baldphone launcher not on your list for a reason? 72.132.236.132 (talk) 22:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)