Talk:List of Bloody Roar characters

Beast form pictures
I believe think a picture of each character's beast form should be included on their pages - RVDDP2501 14:14, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Alright. Let's Get Down to Business.
Looked over these pages, and it seems that almost all of the characters are unencyclopedic and assert no notability. All of them could at fit into this page easy. Oh, and before you complain about "NO WAY, DON'T MERGE," look over Wikipedia Notability. Sorry, but it's the rules. ZeroGiga (talk) 07:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Agreed. They all fail WP:FICT and WP:N. A merge would be a significant improvement to this list (along with a lead added and references). AnmaFinotera (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support merge, unless characters establish their individual notability through secondary sources, it's better to have a "List of..."-article. JACO  PLANE  &bull; 2008-05-9 20:45
 * Oppose merge. FICT isn't even a guideline. And WP:N isn't a policy either. If a rule prevents you from improving Wikipedia, it should be ignored. As soon as ZeroGiga merges Guile into List of Street Fighter characters, I might take such a merge suggestion seriously. But until then... --Pixelface (talk) 01:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hold up... GUILE?? Are you freakin' kidding me!? XD He's notable enough (I think), these guys are not. Seriously, why the **** would I merge a character like GUILE into the list of Street Fighter Characters!? LOL!! -- ZeroGiga (talk) 17:36, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No, I am not "freakin' kidding you." The Guile article "asserts no notability" either. So before you complain, look over Notability. I believe you said....what was it?...."Sorry, but it's the rules". --Pixelface (talk) 23:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support merge - none of the characters assert notability. Once merged in, if for whatever miracle some do assert notability then they can be spun off. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 01:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Oh, and as for evidence of notability, you can start by looking through these 117 game reviews.     --Pixelface (talk) 02:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speaks to the game, not the characters, as you are already well aware. So much for your dramatic "I'm leaving Wikipedia" mess...you didn't even stay gone a week did you. AnmaFinotera (talk) 02:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You think videogame critics don't review characters in their reviews? --Pixelface (talk) 02:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not every last one of them. Its already been noted that any characters that can later be shown to meet notability requirements, irregardless of your whole WP:N is irrelevant mess, can easily be broken out into a PROPER character article. And if someone can show that notability before its merged, that's fine too, they make the case for that individual character and get to work. Running in an yelling "no merge" without actually giving notability for EVERY LAST character is less than useless, as is your claim that you can just ignore N if it "improves" Wikipedia (which is blatantly false). AnmaFinotera (talk) 02:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

OPPOSE MERGE if you do that i want to see all the Tekken characters, Soul Caliber characters and most of all the Dead or Alive characters mergedGrimmjow E6 (talk) 04:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, if they fail notability they will get merged. That's the point. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 20:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)