Talk:List of Brazilian states by population

About the merge
I think this article as well as the others that its sugested to merge with should be expanded instead of merged,since they have valuable information that would be too heavy to develop in one page,besides the U.S has quite a lot of pages in this sense:
 * List of U.S. state capitals
 * List of current and former capital cities within U.S. states
 * List of U.S. states' largest cities


 * List of U.S. states by date of statehood
 * List of U.S. states that were never territories
 * List of U.S. state name etymologies
 * List of state legislatures in the United States


 * List of U.S. states by area
 * List of U.S. states by elevation
 * List of U.S. states by GDP (nominal)
 * List of U.S. states by GDP per capita (nominal)
 * List of U.S. states by population
 * List of U.S. states by population density
 * List of U.S. states by time zone
 * List of U.S. states by unemployment rate


 * List of U.S. state residents names


 * List of U.S. states by traditional abbreviation
 * U.S. postal abbreviations
 * U.S. state temperature extremes
 * Codes: FIPS state code, ISO 3166-2:US


 * Lists of U.S. state insignia

and i dont see a reason why Brazil shouldnt have it,besides the strong U.S bias on Wikipedia--Andres rojas22 17:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

These numbers don't make sense.
I don't understand what the numbers are doing here. Some of them aren't even integers (which is quite strange when talking about numbers of people). They are clearly wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.211.132.72 (talk) 01:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Data doesn't make sense
New design was much better, but the data didn't make any sense at all, so I've reverted the last edit. Janiovj (talk) 00:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I can't see why doesn't make sense. It was only a parameter to compare the population of the state with nations of the world. Could you explain why you did it? Thanks — Guilherme (t/c) 01:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * For starters, it said Sao Paulo had only a million people. Ah, and the numbers weren't integers which is also weird. Janiovj (talk) 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh my god, you are completely correct! I had confuse the population with size of the state. Could you check if hasn't more wrong informations? Thanks by warn me — Guilherme (t/c) 01:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)