Talk:List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes

Withdrawal dates
References for these are needed for pretty much every class. If you know of one for even one class, please add it. Tom pw (talk) 20:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

References - Overuse??
The use of references seems to be over-the-top and is beginning (at least through my eyes) to be intrusive and making the page complex to read. Can we not place the references in a "Notes" column?? Canterberry 10:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

We Could, You Can Edit. AlfreDziku (talk) 07:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:IC250 Cl93 2.jpg
The image Image:IC250 Cl93 2.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:


 * File:GE Freightliner PowerHaul.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --18:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Images have been mixed up
The images in this article no longer match the appropriate loco classes. At some recent point, the images appear to have been mixed up. Is it possible to remove the offending changes and revert to an earlier version? If not, then the images need to be moved to match the appropriate classes and titles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.40.7 (talk) 11:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Which ones do you believe to be incorrect? -- Red rose64 (talk) 18:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

They all seem to be correct now. Thanks. Previously, the class 73 large jpeg was mixed up with the class 86 large image. However, as I can't see any edit history, I assume this must have been some technical glitch with rendering the page. Please therefore ignore my previous comment. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.31.241 (talk) 23:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The archive links failed, because they were not far enough back in time. Now fixed – Iain Bell (talk) 13:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070217154606/http://www.therailwaycentre.com:80/index.html to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061218234321/http://homepages.tcp.co.uk/~pandy/cl26.html to http://homepages.tcp.co.uk/~pandy/cl26.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

No Locomotive
There Is No Class 82 DVT In The Article. AlfreDziku 2 (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * That's because they aren't locomotives. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 09:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I think they are. They look like class 91/Intercity 225 Range AlfreDziku (talk) 07:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Just because you "think" they are doesn't mean that they really are. The term "locomotive" is from Latin words meaning "self-moving". These cannot move by themselves; therefore, they are not locomotives. What they look like is immaterial, the similar styling of these and is probably because they were designed by the same team, with a deliberate effort to produce harmony. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

The Wrong Amounts Of Scrapping,
On This List It Say eg. ‘127’ And ‘126’ Scrapped But, On The Wikipedia Page Like British Rail Class 45 It Says 127 Built, 11 Preserved/116 Scrapped AlfreDziku (talk) 06:59, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * First, provide reliable sources per the policy on verifiability. Second, don't capitalise every word. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 08:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Numbers
Some of the locomotives do have TOPS numbers but, they are not listed. AlfreDziku (talk) 07:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Please Reply to this discussion if you found one of these locomotives. AlfreDziku (talk) 07:14, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

One example is Class 14 All Of Them Only Had Pre-TOPS Number Except 14 901 AlfreDziku (talk) 07:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Pictures
Class D2/7 Has A High Resolution Picture Even Though All Are Scrapped The One In The Photo Isn’t Scrapped AlfreDziku (talk) 12:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)