Talk:List of Budapest Metro stations

Untitled
Hey, Adam don't bother with these many plans of M5 too much... these are only dreams. The most important thing in M5 is to connect the Csepel & Ráckeve lines to Kálvin tér-Astoria. Then to connect Szte. line thru Lehel tér. Whether they will add some stations in to existing lines or not... who knows. Maybe our grandchildren will :) --Sicboy 23:04, 2005 August 29 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Budapest Metro stations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150128112007/http://ko.sze.hu/downloadmanager/download/nohtml/1/id/3174/m/3247 to http://ko.sze.hu/downloadmanager/download/nohtml/1/id/3174/m/3247

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

48 vs 52 stations
The difference is whether we count interchanges as one or each line separately. I support the latter as these interchanges are just stations which are connected through tunnels and escalators. They don’t form one architectural unit in any sense: the different lines’ stations are structurally independent, have different architectural styles, were built usually with decades difference etc. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I see thanks for clarification. Are you sure it makes sense to count Deák Ferenc tér as *3* separate stations? It's really one interconnected structure, but to be honest it's been 11 years since I've been there so I could be mistaken. Most other metro systems count stations with more than one platform as still being 1 station. I support the former, where 1 stations = 1 station. Mattximus (talk) 19:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, nothing apart from 48 and 52 makes any sense. In all three interchanges the platforms are connected more or less (you can change between metro lines without using a new ticket, so there should be a way without leaving the station), but architecturally they have almost nothing in common. This is especially true for the two M4 interchanges (Keleti pályaudvar opened in 1970, Kálvin tér in 1976, while the M4 parts only four years ago), but Deák tér’s architecture also changed a lot during the nearly quarter century it was being built (the current station of M1 was constructed in 1952, according to our article, and M3’s one opened in 1976). However, I can accept your argument too, so it’s OK for me to leave it as it currently is. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 00:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)