Talk:List of Candida species

Redundant class of articles
Isn't any Wikipedia article of the type "List of species in genus X" redundant because the genus's article lists the species? For example, Candida (fungus). Quercus solaris (talk) 00:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * There are some things on this list not found there, and somethings there not found here. I assume a complete list of every possible type would be too long, that why they put things like this in separate articles.   D r e a m Focus  02:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * It depends on the genus. With 2000+ species, it's better to have List of Bulbophyllum species rather than listing all the species in the Bulbophyllum article. That is an extreme example, and I'm not really sure when to say a genus has too species to list in the genus article rather than a stand alone list, but stand alone lists can be appropriate. However, I don't think Candida is too large to list species in the genus article. Plantdrew (talk) 16:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the input. No objection from me either way. I guess WP:Summary style and Template:Main are applicable when a full list exists beyond the genus article. Regards, Quercus solaris (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)